Mostrando postagens com marcador Agriculture. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Agriculture. Mostrar todas as postagens

quarta-feira, 12 de novembro de 2014

Agriculture: The next frontier

 

Africa's newfound taste for an old grain has experienced problems — drought, low yields and costly imports. But new projects are driving the continent towards self-sufficiency.

tbkmedia.de/Alamy

An African community winnowing its rice crop — this ancient farming practice separates the grain from the chaff and helps to remove pests.

Diets in Africa are changing. Traditionally, Africans have obtained their carbohydrate calories from maize (corn) and tubers such as cassava and sweet potatoes. But for the past three decades, rice consumption has been on the increase across the continent. “In the 1960s in Burundi, for example, rice was eaten only on feast days,” says Joseph Bigirimana, regional coordinator for the International Rice Research Institute in east and southern Africa. “Nowadays, Burundians eat rice every day. And for some families, especially in cities, rice is eaten three times a day.” A 2013 report by the International Grains Council, based in London, predicted that over the next five years rice imports would increase in sub-Saharan Africa more rapidly than in any other region in the world.

This newfound taste for rice is understandable, says Gurdev Khush, an agronomist and geneticist at the University of California, Davis. Khush was behind some of the key breeding innovations that helped to ignite the green revolution, an agricultural awakening that brought new strains of rice and farming techniques to Asia in the 1960s. Khush notes that because rice takes much less time to prepare and cook than traditional African standbys such as cassava root, the grain is popular with people who have to cook dinner after a long day at work. Urbanization has also increased the demand for food that can be easily transported and stored. But production is not keeping up with rice's increasing popularity and the continent's growing population, so the gap between supply and demand keeps widening. To fill it, Africa imports a lot of rice, primarily from Asia (see page S50). At the last count, out of 21 million tonnes of rice consumed annually, only about two-thirds — 14.5 million tonnes — were home-grown. Imports made up the 6.5-million-tonne shortfall, at a cost of US1.7 billion.

Closing this gap would have two major benefits for Africa: countries would spend less on rice imports, and the continent would be less vulnerable if the imports stopped or became prohibitively expensive. There is reason to worry about the price of rice. During the global food crisis of 2008, rice prices quadrupled within just a few months, from less than 300 a tonne to more than 1,200 a tonne on the world market. Some analysts predict that by 2020 an expanding population and shrinking resources will mean that Asia may no longer have any rice to export and may need to import it instead.

Africa is aiming for self-sufficiency in rice production, but that does not look imminent. “Africa imports a lot of rice and will continue to,” says Chris Barrett, director of the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. “That's not going to change in the next five to ten years.” What is changing is the way that rice is grown in Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya and other African countries. Scientists and farmers are teaming up to make the crop more sustainable, more productive and more important to Africa's future than ever before. AfricaRice, an independent consortium of 25 rice-producing countries in Africa, is optimistic about the challenge ahead. And, says its director-general Papa Abdoulaye Seck, the “rice sector development can become an engine for economic growth across the continent”.

Rice economics

West Africa is the continent's leading rice-producing region, and the countries there are especially bullish about their ability to meet local demands. “Anybody who says Nigeria cannot be self-sufficient in rice production either does not know the country or does not know rice, or both, or is just being mischievous,” says Martin Fregene, adviser to the country's agriculture minister, Akinwumi Adesina. If recent trends continue, Fregene predicts that Nigeria could produce enough rice to feed its people by 2016.

Countries such as Nigeria are taking aggressive economic approaches to encourage rice production — for example, by giving hefty tax breaks to anyone who grows and mills rice locally. In Nigeria, this arrangement has encouraged at least one of its citizens, multi-billionaire Aliko Dangote, to ramp up his rice business. In August 2014, Forbes reported that Dangote had invested 1 billion in rice production. He has purchased 150,000 hectares of farmland on which he plans to produce 1.4 million tonnes of rice every year, which he will then process in the largest rice mill in Africa — the one he intends to build.

In early 2014, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in Seattle, Washington, and Germany's Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development made a different kind of investment in rice by founding the Competitive African Rice Initiative (CARI). This programme will benefit smallholder rice farmers who have a daily income of less than 2 by helping them to produce rice that is more competitive in the local marketplace. Among other things, the programme is helping to identify the varieties of rice that are most sought after in the local markets and the facilities that will be required to grow and sell it. “We started with the market and worked our way backwards,” says Richard Rogers, senior programme officer at the Gates Foundation.

Better yields, brighter future

Alexis Duclos/Gama-Rapho/Getty

Nerica rice varieties are high yielding and hardy.

But encouraging people to grow and process rice is only part of the solution. A more direct approach to increasing rice production is to increase rice yield. And there is plenty of room for improvement in Africa, where the yield is very low, on average 2.2 tonnes per hectare — much less than the world average, which is 3.4 tonnes per hectare, and only one-third of the average yield in China, the world's leading rice producer.

Regular and severe drought is one reason for Africa's low yield. Although rice does not have to be submerged in paddy fields to grow well, it does need a lot of water. Irrigation systems are expensive, so about 80 of farmers rely on rainfall alone. But in most places, there is not enough rain to ensure healthy crops. A study1 spanning 1999 to 2003 found that yield for rice grown in rain-dependent lowlands was 2.0 tonnes per hectare, whereas in irrigated lowlands the yield was 70 more.

Upland areas might have more rain, but they can lack nitrogen. In some upland areas, the yield is only one tonne per hectare. Fertilizers can supply the needed nitrogen, but many farmers do not have enough money to buy them — at least in the quantities needed to significantly boost the yield.

In the absence of more money to build irrigation systems or buy fertilizers, the scientific solution is to breed new varieties of rice that need less water and less nitrogen. In fact, this is one of the most promising approaches to solving many of Africa's rice-growing problems.

Only two cultivated species of rice exist. Asian farmers domesticated one of them, Oryza sativa, and a few thousand years later African farmers domesticated the other, Oryza glaberrima (see page S58)2. The two species have some traits in common but also significant differences. Crucially, O. sativa produces much higher yields, which gives it more obvious commercial value. It is the species that over the years has come to be grown all over the world. Ever since O. sativa was introduced into Africa, perhaps as early as the 1500s, O. glaberrima pretty much faded into the bush.

In the process, something was lost. O. glaberrima is a survivor. It can thrive in harsh conditions that kill its Asian cousin3. In the 1990s, plant breeders at AfricaRice decided to try to get some of that hardiness back. They began crossing the two species, hoping to produce a new kind of rice that could be both high-yielding and tolerant. New Rice for Africa, or Nerica, was born.

Nerica is not a single variety of rice but rather a number of different varieties. In general, Nerica strains are high-yielding, producing nearly twice as much per hectare as traditional rice grown in the same conditions. Nerica plants also mature in a hurry, which gives weeds and drought less time to do their damage. Another big benefit is that they have a 25 higher protein content than the world-market average.

Specific Nerica varieties have been developed for various regional conditions. They may be resistant to devastating diseases that are endemic in some areas or to destructive pests that wreak havoc in others. And new varieties are being created all the time. In 2013, for example, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, a non-profit organization that promotes agriculture on the continent, partnered with the University of Port Harcourt in Nigeria to release three new lowland varieties that were long-grained, high quality and resistant to stresses such as iron toxicity and drought.

In 2005, seven West African countries received funding from the African Development Bank to finance the distribution of Nerica. Farmers chose varieties to grow on the basis of their needs. At the beginning of the project, Nerica strains were being grown on 200,000 hectares across all of sub-Saharan Africa. By 2011, they covered at least 800,000 hectares. Pre-project rice yield was about 1 tonne per hectare in the uplands, but yield now averages 2.5 to 3 times as much. Over the six years of the project, participating farmers earned 14.4 million more than they would have done otherwise, and the roughly 35,000 members of their households rose above the poverty line of 1.25 a day.

Many researchers see parallels between Africa today and Asia in the early 1960s. Asia was then on the brink of a green revolution that improved food security, revitalized economies and stabilized governments. Recreating the Asian green revolution in Africa would be a tall order. But with a combined effort by scientists, farmers, governments and investors, African rice could enter a new era, and history could be repeated.

Snap 2014-11-12 at 12.36.50

terça-feira, 28 de outubro de 2014

How big data is helping farmers save millions

 

The predictive abilities of big data is being used to improve farming outcomes (Photo: Shu...

The predictive abilities of big data is being used to improve farming outcomes (Photo: Shutterstock)

Data scientists studying crop growth and weather patterns in Colombia have advised rice farmers not to plant crops, saving them millions of dollars. The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the Colombian Rice Growers Federation have developed a computer model that can work out what crops work best under specific weather conditions in certain areas.

Farming has always been as much art as science: knowing what to plant and when is often intuitive for many farmers. However the vagaries of shifting weather patterns and climate change make this much more difficult and a crop destroyed by inclement weather or drought may cost small hold farmers and their families their livelihoods. In Colombia, where rice yields are already dropping and free trade agreements threaten local farmers, improving farming conditions by harnessing the predictive abilities of big data is showing signs of being terrifically useful.

According to CIAT: "Joint efforts on multi-environment trials with detailed physiological evaluation, studies on the adaptation of elite lines, historical data analysis, and crop modeling in Colombia provided important inputs for initiating the development of a system to better manage rice under highly variable weather scenarios."

Considering that there are predictions of massive crop yield fall offs in the coming decades thanks to climate change, such predictive computer modelling is going to become increasingly necessary. CIAT has found that climate accounts for 30 - 40 percent of crop production variability in some parts of Colombia.

Colombia’s rice yields have apparently been hit by climate change problems and harvests of the staple food have declined by a tonne per hectare in the past five years, a steep drop. Maize, potato, cassava and beans are also important crops and the modelling tool will eventually take these in also, under the two year agreement between CIAT and Colombia’s ministry of agriculture.

Last year, researchers from CIAT working with Colombian Rice Growers Federation, advised a group of Colombian farmers against planting crops as they predicted a drought would hit. They were right and saved farmers $3.8 million; those who did not take their advice were not as lucky and lost their crops. Their advice was well grounded: they had developed a complex computer model that had ten years’ worth of data from Colombian farms, from farm management and crop yield to the types of crops and the weather conditions that year. From this inferences could be drawn on what works where, and during what kinds of weather conditions. Whilst traditional farming knowledge is already based around such concepts – otherwise how could farmers grow anything? – this refinement seems to have led to greater accuracy if their success so far is any way to tell.

This project won the UN’s Big Data Climate Challenge in September and is already being looked at in other nations, such as Nigeria. The UN project wishes to, "bring forward data-driven evidence of the economic dimensions of climate change," using big data and analytics. The fields of study are diverse, from transportation and smart cities to agriculture and behavioral science.

 

 

segunda-feira, 29 de setembro de 2014

World needs ‘paradigm shift’ towards sustainable agriculture, UN agency urges

 

Photo: World Bank/Maria Fleischmann

29 September 2014 – In order to move towards more sustainable agriculture, a broader approach is needed to overhaul the world’s food system, the head of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) said today, as he pressed for a global reduction in the quantity of chemicals and water in contemporary agriculture.

Speaking at the opening of the 24th session of the Committee on Agriculture (COAG) in Rome, Director-General José Graziano da Silva called for a “paradigm shift” in global attitudes on agriculture, adding that only by decreasing the amounts of “inputs,” such as water and chemicals, could the sector move towards a more sustainable and productive long-term path.

“We cannot rely on an input-intensive model to increase production,” Mr. Graziano da Silva declared. “The solutions of the past have shown their limits.”

Pointing to options such as agro-ecology, climate-smart agriculture, biotechnology and the use of genetically modified organisms, the Director-General emphasized that global food production would need to grow by 60 per cent by 2050 in order to meet the expected demand from an anticipated world population of nine billion.

“We need to explore these alternatives using an inclusive approach based on science and evidence, not on ideologies,” he continued.

Established in 1971 and with over 100 members within its ranks, the COAG’s biennial meeting is currently addressing a wide range of issues, including family farming, sustainable agriculture, food safety, water governance, soil management and agricultural heritage systems.

Addressing the Committee in his keynote speech, the President of the Dominican Republic, Danilo Medina, underscored his Government’s support of the principle that food be considered a universal right and noted that his country was on the verge of passing a law establishing said right.

 

Snap 2014-09-29 at 21.56.28


News Tracker: past stories on this issue

World hunger falls, but number of undernourished remains ‘unacceptably high’ – joint UN report

sexta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2014

High Tech Harvest

 

harvestHeader

 

How to grow more mussels

With an abundance of produce and meat in our markets, Americans may consider a cheap, reliable food supply to be a challenge only for developing countries. But a changing climate and booming population will stretch the resources of even the most tech-savvy nations. In the U.S., extreme Western droughts and Midwestern floods test the resilience of our agricultural systems. Engineers have long provided ways to raise agricultural production and efficiency, harkening back to the plow and irrigation systems. They continue that work today. The potential payoff: a high-tech harvest of new tools and understanding of increasingly complex agricultural systems.

leafSensor

Credit: NSF

Reinventing grandpa's farm

Engineering has cultivated agricultural evolution for centuries, with tractors and milking machines making farming less backbreaking, and with pesticides and genetically modified plants making farming more productive. The next tech revolution may allow farmers to electronically tend their fields. Sensors will alert farmers when plants are thirsty and autonomously detect and capture salmonella and other pathogens, eliminating contamination before that tomato lands on your plate. Assisted by computer vision and robotics, farmers can precision-thin and treat lettuce and corn for maximum yield.

futurefood

Credit: Blue River Technology

Future food

The word's population is expected to exceed 10 billion by 2100. As demand for food, water and energy grows, agriculture will need to become more efficient and productive. Innovative engineers are finding sustainable solutions in agricultural materials, from waste wood to fungi. They are even finding ways to restore lands damaged by industrial waste to support agriculture and bioenergy crops. Researchers are sustainably harvesting marine life, getting help from robots, and, as perhaps the ultimate in low-water, low-energy food production, are growing beef through tissue engineering, with nary a cow in sight.

soybeans

Credit: Tom Campbell, Purdue Agricultural Communication

Defending against disaster

Increasingly harsh environmental conditions create an enormous need for technologies that support resilient agricultural systems. Drought and pollution are among the nation's greatest challenges. Often, it seems, the antidote lies within nature itself. The flesh of the prickly pear cactus is an effective, inexpensive way to clean water, while reprogramed microbes can destroy contaminates in water and soil. New methods to detect trace pollutants offer means to keep water sources safe. Engineers are using computational models to study food systems and make distribution more flexible, from farms to food banks.


Engineering agriculture's future

What if emerging technologies for agriculture were put into practice?

Related Websites:
Drought.gov offers weekly maps and reports on
U.S. drought conditions and on crop and soil moisture levels.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations presented in this material are only those of the presenter grantee/researcher, author, or agency employee; and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

domingo, 29 de junho de 2014

'Land grabbing' could help feed at least 300 million people


Crops grown on "land-grabbed" areas in developing countries could have the potential to feed an extra 100 million people worldwide, a new study has shown.

The improved infrastructure brought about by foreign investment could increase the productivity of subsistence farmlands in countries such as Indonesia and Papua New Guinea and could mean these lands can feed at least 300 million people around the world. This is compared to about 190 million people that could be fed if the land was left tended to by the local population.

The findings have been published today, 27 June, in IOP Publishing's journal Environmental Research Letters.

The large-scale acquisition of land by foreign governments and business -- more commonly known as land grabbing -- is a contentious issue, particularly in Africa where a large number of deals have taken place in regions facing food security problems and malnutrition.

Some argue that investment by foreign governments and business will drastically improve crop yields, generate new jobs and bring new knowledge and infrastructure to often deprived areas. Others highlight the fact that any food grown is often exported to other regions and argue that such deals can strip local communities of their land, water and natural resources, leaving them in a far worse state.

In their study, the researchers, from the Politecnico di Milano, Italy, and University of Virginia, US, quantified the maximum amount of food that could be produced from crops grown on acquired lands and the number of people that this could feed. They also compared the use of traditional farming techniques to industrialised agricultural methods, to come up with the yield gap.

To arrive at their results, the researchers used a unique dataset of all land deals, greater than 200 hectares, which had occurred after 2000. Each land deal included information regarding the spatial extent of the acquired land, the dominant crop, and whether a deal was concluded with a signed or oral contract, or just intended with an expression of interest.

The researchers calculated the potential maximum crop yield from each of these deals and then used the crop's food calories to determine the amount of people it could feed.

If all of the acquired lands were farmed to their full capacity -- a 100% closure of the yield gap -- there would be a 308 per cent increase in rice production, a 280 per cent increase in maize production, a 148 per cent increase in sugar cane production, and a 130 per cent increase in oil palm production, the researchers calculated.

Taking into account the proportion of crops that can be used for food production, as well as the amount needed for a "balanced diet," the results showed that between 300 and 550 million people could be fed by crops grown in the acquired land, compared with between 190 and 370 million people that could be fed if the local community used the land without making major investments.

The results also revealed that the most targeted countries for land grabs are Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea and the former Sudan. Altogether, these nations account for around 82 per cent of the total food calories that can be produced by acquired croplands worldwide.

It has been reported in previous studies that around 32.9 million hectares of land have been acquired by large-scale international investors for different purposes. A total of 22 million hectares were acquired for agriculture.

The authors, Maria Cristina Rulli from Politecnico di Milano and Paolo D'Odorico from University of Virginia, said: "Our study has provided a comprehensive assessment of the amount of food that can potentially be produced in land acquired by foreign investors in countries such as Sudan and Indonesia."

Accordingly, "Policy makers need to be aware that if this food were used to feed the local populations it would be sufficient to abate malnourishment in each of these countries even without investments aiming at the closure of the yield gap. Such investments would lead to substantial improvements in crop yields mainly in African countries.

"At the moment there are still open questions which would help inform the debate over what happens to acquired land such as, what happens to food produced? Is it shipped abroad? Were these lands already used for agriculture prior to the acquisition, and (if so) for the cultivation of what crops? With what yields? Answers to these questions would allow us to quantify the decrease in food available to the local communities, and come up with management strategies to mitigate possible negative impacts on the local communities of large scale land acquisition."

domingo, 1 de junho de 2014

Drop in global malnutrition depends on agricultural productivity, climate change

 

May 29, 2014

Purdue University

Global malnutrition could fall 84 percent by the year 2050 as incomes in developing countries grow -- but only if agricultural productivity continues to improve and climate change does not severely damage agriculture, researchers say. According to the researchers' models, income growth coupled with projected increases in agricultural productivity could raise more than half a billion people out of extreme hunger by mid-century.


Agricultural economists Uris Baldos, left, and Thomas Hertel.

Global malnutrition could fall 84 percent by the year 2050 as incomes in developing countries grow -- but only if agricultural productivity continues to improve and climate change does not severely damage agriculture, Purdue University researchers say.

"The prevalence and severity of global malnutrition could drop significantly by 2050, particularly in the poorest regions of the world," said Thomas Hertel, Distinguished Professor of Agricultural Economics. "But if productivity does not grow, global malnutrition will worsen even if incomes increase. Climate change also adds a good deal of uncertainty to these projections."

Hertel and doctoral student Uris Baldos developed a combination of economic models -- one that captures the main drivers of crop supply and demand and another that assesses food security based on caloric consumption -- to predict how global food security from 2006 to 2050 could be affected by changes in population, income, bioenergy, agricultural productivity and climate.

According to the models, income growth coupled with projected increases in agricultural productivity could raise more than half a billion people out of extreme hunger by mid-century.

Income is also set to eclipse population as the dominant driver of food security, a "historical first," said Baldos.

"We expect that the population driver will diminish relative to per capita income in the coming decades, especially in the developing world," he said.

Growth in income will allow people to increase the amount of food they consume and "upgrade" their diets by adding more meat and processed foods to staples such as crops and starches. The shift toward a diet higher in calories and richer in protein could lift many in hunger-stricken regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, China and Mongolia above the malnutrition line.

Globally, the volume of food consumed per capita could increase by about 31 percent. In developing regions with strong growth in income and population, consumption could rise by about 56 to 75 percent.

But these projections depend heavily on corresponding increases in agricultural productivity, Hertel said. Productivity is a measure of crop yields relative to the inputs used in producing them such as land, labor and fertilizers. Increased global productivity improved the availability of food over the last 50 years, but this trend must continue between now and 2050 to buttress food security.

"There is a clear link between productivity growth in agriculture and the number of malnourished people," Hertel said. "Boosting productivity tends to lower food prices, and declines in the cost of food in turn can allow for better nutrition. Income growth alone will not be enough to solve the malnutrition problem."

Historically, agricultural productivity has been driven by investments in agricultural research and development. The researchers said improvements in food security depend on increasing research spending, especially over the next two decades.

"The decisions we make now about funding for agricultural research will have implications for a number of malnourished people in 2050," Hertel said. "If agricultural productivity stagnates, there will be far more malnourished people in the future, particularly in regions where chronic hunger is already present."

The researchers also cautioned that the impacts of a changing climate on crop yields remain uncertain.

Rising temperatures could extend the growing season in northern latitudes, and an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could benefit some crops by improving water efficiency. But climate change is complicated, Hertel said.

"Up to 2050, there could be some pluses for agriculture," he said. "But in the longer run, adverse temperatures will likely become overwhelming, and rising carbon dioxide concentrations won't help after a certain point. Eventually, you drop off a cliff."

The models show that climate change is a less influential driver of global food security than income, population and productivity -- but it could still pose a significant risk to the nutrition levels of people living in the world's poorest regions, Baldos said.

"People living in the most hunger-stricken areas will be the most vulnerable to climate change."


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Purdue University. The original article was written by Natalie van Hoose. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Uris Lantz C. Baldos, Thomas W. Hertel. Global food security in 2050: the role of agricultural productivity and climate change. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2014; DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12048